Sunday, January 31, 2010

Palin Urges Sarah Palin Urges A GOP-Tea Party Merger


While many of the most conservative politicians in the country have now weaseled out of next week's National Tea Party Convention in Nashville, the headliner is still planning to show up. You have to wonder if they backed out in fear of being blown our of the water by the Ex-Governor.

Sarah Palin told Fox News on Thursday that, unlike Reps. Michelle Bachmann (R-Minn) and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), she still intends to speak at the convention, despite the growing controversy over the obscure for-profit entity running the event. Let's face it folks...this little to-do over the sponsor of the massive tea-party gives them a chance to run for the hills.

"Oh, you betcha I'm going to be there," Palin told Greta Van Susteren. "I'm going to speak there because there are people traveling from many miles away to hear what that tea party movement is all about and what that message is that should be received by our politicians in Washington. I'm honored to get to be there."

Citizen Palin will receive $100,000 to deliver the keynote address at the conference. Her fee, she said, "go right back into the cause" as donations "to people and to events, those things that I believe in that will help perpetuate the message, the message being, Government, you have constitutional limits. You better start abiding by them."
---o0o---

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Friday, January 29, 2010

Michelle Bachman chickens out of the Tea Party to end all Tea Parties


That upcoming Tea Party convention of Republican (and Democratic!) activists lost two prominent speakers last Thursday-- the latest sign of factionalism and disagreement over how highlight the movement as an insurgent political force.


Republican Reps. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee canceled their appearances after being billed as speakers at the gathering. Ex-Governor Sarah Palin remains the headline speaker at the event.
---o0o---

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Sarah takes on Obama's SOTU speech!



"I don’t wish to speak too harshly about President Obama..." And then, the Ex-Governor tears him a new one. I hope you're looking forward to HER first State of the Union speech as much as I am.

The Credibility Gap
Today at 2:17pm, from Sarah's FaceBook page




While I don’t wish to speak too harshly about President Obama’s state of the union address, we live in challenging times that call for candor. I call them as I see them, and I hope my frank assessment will be taken as an honest effort to move this conversation forward.

Last night, the president spoke of the “credibility gap” between the public’s expectations of their leaders and what those leaders actually deliver. “Credibility gap” is a good way to describe the chasm between rhetoric and reality in the president’s address. The contradictions seemed endless.

He called for Democrats and Republicans to “work through our differences,” but last year he dismissed any notion of bipartisanship when he smugly told Republicans, “I won.”

He talked like a Washington “outsider,” but he runs Washington! He’s had everything any president could ask for – an overwhelming majority in Congress and a fawning press corps that feels tingles every time he speaks. There was nothing preventing him from pursuing “common sense” solutions all along. He didn’t pursue them because they weren’t his priorities, and he spent his speech blaming Republicans for the problems caused by his own policies.

He dared us to “let him know” if we have a better health care plan, but he refused to allow Republicans in on the negotiations or consider any ideas for real free market and patient-centered reforms. We’ve been “letting him know” our ideas for months from the town halls to the tea parties, but he isn’t interested in listening. Instead he keeps making the nonsensical claim that his massive trillion-dollar health care bill won’t increase the deficit.

Americans are suffering from job losses and lower wages, yet the president practically demanded applause when he mentioned tax cuts, as if allowing people to keep more of their own hard-earned money is an act of noblesse oblige. He claims that he cut taxes, but I must have missed that. I see his policies as paving the way for massive tax increases and inflation, which is the “hidden tax” that most hurts the poor and the elderly living on fixed incomes.

He condemned lobbyists, but his White House is filled with former lobbyists, and this has been a banner year for K Street with his stimulus bill, aka the Lobbyist’s Full Employment Act. He talked about a “deficit of trust” and the need to “do our work in the open,” but he chased away the C-SPAN cameras and cut deals with insurance industry lobbyists behind closed doors.

He spoke of doing what’s best for the next generation and not leaving our children with a “mountain of debt,” but under his watch this year, government spending is up by 22%, and his budget will triple our national debt.

He spoke of a spending freeze, but doesn’t he realize that each new program he’s proposing comes with a new price tag? A spending freeze is a nice idea, but it doesn’t address the root cause of the problem. We need a comprehensive examination of the role of government spending. The president’s deficit commission is little more than a bipartisan tax hike committee, lending political cover to raise taxes without seriously addressing the problem of spending.

He condemned bailouts, but he voted for them and then expanded and extended them. He praised the House’s financial reform bill, but where was Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in that bill? He still hasn’t told us when we’ll be getting out of the auto and the mortgage industries. He praised small businesses, but he’s spent the past year as a friend to big corporations and their lobbyists, who always find a way to make government regulations work in their favor at the expense of their mom & pop competitors.

He praised the effectiveness of his stimulus bill, but then he called for another one – this time cleverly renamed a “jobs bill.” The first stimulus was sold to us as a jobs bill that would keep unemployment under 8%. We now have double digit unemployment with no end in sight. Why should we trust this new “jobs bill”?

He talked about “making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development,” but apparently it’s still too tough for his Interior Secretary to move ahead with Virginia’s offshore oil and gas leases. If they’re dragging their feet on leases, how long will it take them to build “safe, clean nuclear power plants”? Meanwhile, he continued to emphasize “green jobs,” which require massive government subsidies for inefficient technologies that can’t survive on their own in the real world of the free market.

He spoke of supporting young girls in Afghanistan who want to go to school and young women in Iran who courageously protest in the streets, but where were his words of encouragement to the young girls of Afghanistan in his West Point speech? And where was his support for the young women of Iran when they were being gunned down in the streets of Tehran?

Despite speaking for an hour, the president only spent 10% of his speech on foreign policy, and he left us with many unanswered questions. Does he still think trying the 9/11 terrorists in New York is a good idea? Does he still think closing Gitmo is a good idea? Does he still believe in Mirandizing terrorists after the Christmas bomber fiasco? Does he believe we’re in a war against terrorists, or does he think this is just a global crime spree? Does he understand that the first priority of our government is to keep our country safe?

In his address last night, the president once again revealed that there’s a fundamental disconnect between what the American people expect from their government, and what he wants to deliver. He’s still proposing failed top-down big government solutions to our problems. Instead of smaller, smarter government, he’s taken a government that was already too big and supersized it.

Real private sector jobs are created when taxes are low, investment is high, and people are free to go about their business without the heavy hand of government. The president thinks innovation comes from government subsidies. Common sense conservatives know innovation comes from unleashing the creative energy of American entrepreneurs.

Everything seems to be “unexpected” to this administration: unexpected job losses; unexpected housing numbers; unexpected political losses in Massachusetts, Virginia, and New Jersey. True leaders lead best when confronted with the unexpected. But instead of leading us, the president lectured us. He lectured Wall Street; he lectured Main Street; he lectured Congress; he even lectured our Supreme Court Justices.

He criticized politicians who “wage a perpetual campaign,” but he gave a campaign speech instead of a state of the union address. The campaign is over, and President Obama now has something that candidate Obama never had: an actual track record in office. We now can see the failed policies behind the flowery words. If Americans feel as cynical as the president suggests, perhaps it’s because the audacity of his recycled rhetoric no longer inspires hope.

Real leadership requires results. Real hope lies in the ingenuity, generosity, and boundless courage of the American people whose voices are still not being heard in Washington.

- Sarah Palin

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Sarah takes on "women's rights" groups


Once again, The Ex-Governor tackles the tough subjects...on her Facebook page today, she wonders about their double-standards.

Women's Rights Groups: Your Double Standard is Showing
By Sarah Palin
on Facebook, January 26, 2010

Women’s Rights groups, like NOW, commendably call out advertisers and networks for airing sexist and demeaning portrayals of women that lead to young women’s diminished self-esteem and acceptance of roles as mere sexed-up objects.

What a ridiculous situation they’re getting themselves into now with their protest of CBS airing a pro-life ad during the upcoming Super Bowl game. The ad will feature Heisman trophy winner Tim Tebow and his mom, and they’ll speak to the sanctity of life and the beautiful potential within every innocent child as Mrs. Tebow acknowledges her choice to give Tim life, despite less than ideal circumstances. Messages like this empower women! This speaks to the strength and commitment and nurturing spirit within women. The message says everything positive and nothing negative about the power of women – and life. Evidently, some women’s rights groups like NOW do not like that message.

NOW is looking at the pro-life issue backwards. Women should be reminded that they are strong enough and smart enough to make decisions that allow for career and educational opportunities while still giving their babies a chance at life. In my own home, my daughter Bristol has also been challenged by pro-abortion “women’s rights” groups who don’t agree with her decision to have her baby, nor do they like the abstinence message which she articulated as her personal commitment. NOW could gain ground and credibility with everyday Americans, thus allowing their pro-women message to be heard by more than just their ardent supporters, if they made wiser decisions regarding which battles to pick. They should call attention to and embrace the Tebows’ message, instead of covertly and overtly disrespecting what Mrs. Tebow, Bristol, and millions of other women have chosen to do (in less than ideal circumstances).

My message to these groups who are inexplicably offended by a pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life message airing during the Super Bowl: please concentrate on empowering women, help with efforts to prevent unexpected pregnancies, stay consistent with your message that for too long women have been made to feel like sex objects in our “modern” culture and that we can expect better in 2010. But don’t let your double standard glare so vividly as to undo some of the good to which you could contribute.

And CBS: just do the right thing. Don’t cave. Have the backbone to run the ad.

To the Tebows: thank you. America is listening. We appreciate you.
---o0o---

Monday, January 25, 2010

Citizen Palin dices up President Obama on the eve of his State Of The Union Address



By Mona Goldwater

Ex-Governor Palin took on the President tonight in an incisive, hard-hitting, and at times excoriating, post on her Facebook page. You go, girl! Clearly Citizen Palin is perfectly willing to go head to head with the Teleprompter Guy. I'd like to think this is just a glimpse of what we will see in the Obama-Palin debates in the summer and fall of 2012. Keep 'em coming, Governor!

Mr. President: Please Try, "I'm Listening, People," Instead of "Listen Up, People!"

By Sarah Palin

Posted on Facebook, Monday, January 25, 2010 at 6:33pm

We’ve now seen three landslide Republican victories in three states that President Obama carried in 2008. From the tea parties to the town halls to the Massachusetts Miracle, Americans have tried to make their opposition to Washington’s big government agenda loud and clear.
But the President has decided that this current discontent isn’t his fault, it’s ours. He seems to think we just don’t understand what’s going on because he hasn’t had the chance – in his 411 speeches and 158 interviews last year – to adequately explain his policies to us.
Instead of sensibly telling the American people, “I’m listening,” the president is saying, “Listen up, people!” This approach is precisely the reason people are upset with Washington. Americans understand the president’s policies. We just don’t agree with them. But the president has refused to shift focus and come around to the center from the far left. Instead he and his old campaign advisers are regrouping to put a new spin on the same old agenda for 2010.



Americans aren’t looking for more political strategists. We’re looking for real leadership that listens and delivers results. The president’s former campaign adviser is now calling on supporters to “get on the same page,” but what’s on that page? He claims that the president is “resolved” to “keep fighting for” his agenda, but we’ve already seen what that government-growth agenda involves, and frankly the hype doesn’t give us much hope. Real health care reform requires a free market approach; real job creation involves incentivizing, not punishing, the job-creators; reining in the “big banks” means ending bailouts; and stopping “the undue influence of lobbyists” means not cutting deals with them behind closed doors.

Instead of real leadership, though, we’ve had broken promises and backroom deals. One of the worst: candidate Obama promised to go through the federal budget “with a scalpel,” but President Obama spent four times more than his predecessor. Want more? Candidate Obama promised that lobbyists “won’t find a job in my White House,” but President Obama gave at least a dozen former lobbyists top administration jobs. Candidate Obama promised us that we could view his health care deliberations openly and honestly on C-SPAN, but President Obama cut deals behind closed doors with industry lobbyists. Candidate Obama promised us that we would have at least five days to read all major legislation, but President Obama rushed through bills before members of Congress could even read them.

Candidate Obama promised us that his economic stimulus package would be targeted and pork-free, but President Obama signed a stimulus bill loaded with pork and goodies for corporate cronies. Candidate Obama railed against Wall Street greed, but President Obama cozied up to bankers as he extended and expanded their bailouts. Candidate Obama promised us that for “Every dollar that I’ve proposed [in spending], I’ve proposed an additional cut so that it matches.” We’re still waiting to see how President Obama will cut spending to match the trillion he’s spent.




More than anything, Americans were promised jobs, but the president’s stimulus package has failed to stem our rising unemployment rate. Maybe it was unfair to expect that an administration with so little private sector experience would understand something about job creation. How many Obama Administration officials have ever had to make a payroll or craft a business plan in the private sector? How many have had to worry about not having the resources to invest and expand? The president’s big government policies have made hiring a new employee a difficult commitment for employers to make. Ask yourself if the Obama Administration has done anything to make it easier for employers to hire. Have they given us any reassurance that the president will keep taxes low and not impose expensive new regulations?

Candidate Obama over-promised; President Obama has under-delivered. We understand you, Mr. President. We’ve listened to you again and again. We ask that you now listen to the American people.

---o0o---

Sunday, January 24, 2010

VICTORY! The gang that couldn't shoot straight misfires again



"Republican Scott Brown rode a wave of voter anger to beat Democrat Martha Coakley. The loss was a stunning embarrassment for the White House. It also signaled big political problems for the president's party this fall when House, Senate and gubernatorial candidates are on the ballot nationwide." Read the grim Associated Press story here



click to enlarge

There are rumors afoot that Scott Brown may be the new Republican Man On Horseback, with people--including Matt Drudge--already suggesting he may pull "an Obama" and parlay his time as a state Senator, and a partial term in the United States Senate into a run for the Oval Office. Saran Palin, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Haley Barbour, Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, Tim Pawlenty, Jeb Bush, John Huntsman, Paul Ryan, Rick Santorum (we thought he was in jail or something!), and John Thune may have a different idea. . .
---o0o---

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Cindy McCain comes out in favor of gay rights. Senator McCain? Not so much.



Cindy McCain, the wife of 2008 Republican presidential nominee John McCain, and their daughter Meghan have posed for photos endorsing pro-gay marriage forces in California. Ms. McCain appears with silver duct tape across her mouth and "NOH8" written on one cheek in a photo published on NOH8's website. NOH8 is a gay rights group opposed to Proposition 8.

John McCain's office released a statement that the Arizona senator respects the views of members of his family but nonetheless remains opposed to gay marriage. If one recent book is any indication, things have probably turned even grimmer at home recently with this family rift...
---o0o---

Friday, January 22, 2010

Sarah's unveils a new 'do on the Oprah show & tells how she is going to reinvigorate journalism



Sarah Palin flummoxed Oprah Winfrey today with her new hairdo, replete with corkscrew curls...you know, sort of looking like she just stepped out of The Waltons or Little House on the Prairie.

"Look at your hair!" Oprah blurted in the middle of her intro: "What did you do to your hair?" "Do you like it?," Sarah said. "I tried to look like you." "It's kind of cute, but I was just surprised to see you pop up there with the curls. Great. What's the weather like in Wasilla today?

Early opinion is that it's not her best look.

More importantly, the Ex-Governor told Oprah she is going try to to return journalism back to "what it is supposed to be."

"When I studied journalism, we learned all about the who, what, when, where and why of reporting. Just stating the facts. I'll engage in that, kind of ratcheting back down to the simplicity of what journalism should be about: just the basics and letting the people decide what their opinion will be."
---o0o---

Thursday, January 21, 2010

JFK and Marilyn Monroe Getting Cozy


click to enlarge
---o0o---

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Together Again: Senator John McCain and Ex-Governor Sarah Palin


click to enlarge

Senator John McCain announced Wednesday that Ex-Governor/2008 VP candidate Sarah Palin will join him at both a fundraising event, as well as a rally, in Phoenix on March 26. She will campaign for his re-election to the U.S. Senate.

Wow. After her resignation, and the recent of savaging of Sarah Palin in the book "Game Change" this is stunning. The Republican Establishment keeps trying to marginalize and brush her away, and now, one of their stalwarts desperately needs her help.

McCain recently predicted in an interview that Ex-Governor Palin will be a "major player" in GOP affairs.
---o0o---

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Draft Palin! - Let's do it right this time



click to enlarge
---o0o---

Monday, January 18, 2010

Does Her Dad Own a Liquor Store?

By Phil "The Rock" Rockington



...because that's the only thing that can top a beautiful woman talking about sports. Sarah Heath showing that even at age 21 she could read off of a teleprompter and look gorgeous at the same time. Most women are useless when they talk sports, but Sarah sounds like an old pro. I'd hunker down over a plate of nachos with her any day.



---o0o---

How low can Politico go? When they can't find brickbats to hurl, they go for hypotheticals from Really Reliable Sources (e.g., Cheech and Chong)

Cheech and Chong recently answered a question from Politico.com about which politician they'd most like to smoke pot with. Sarah Palin, as it turns out. Cheech Marin thinks she grows it herself in Alaska, and Tommy Chong noted that she "answers a lot of questions like a stoner."


---o0o---

Sunday, January 17, 2010

A sad day in the annals of "journalism"

It's a very sad day in the annals of journalism, and another reminder of just why the newspaper business is dying. Katie Couric's interviews with Sarah Palin have just received the Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Award from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism.

It is stunning when ambush journalism is awarded one of the formerly well-regarded Pulitzer honors, when in fact, the Pulitzer board should have sanctioned Katie Couric along with her rapidly shrinking network.


---o0o---

Saturday, January 16, 2010

On the Tragedy in Haiti


Unlike her Republican brethren Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin is moved by the tragedy in Haiti and encourages us to donate and do whatever we can... Bravo Sarah!

From Sarah Palin's Facebook page:

Wednesday, January 13, 2010 at 9:40pm

Todd and I join the world in extending our thoughts and prayers to the victims and families of those so impacted by the earthquake in Haiti. Our hearts are with the people of Haiti as they rebuild their country. Join us in donating to the American Red Cross relief effort. To assist those in need, consider sending a $10 donation to the Red Cross by texting 'Haiti' to 90999.
---o0o---

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Sheer produndity, legal and political analysis from Saran Palin: Wise up Barack!

More incisive analysis from the Ex-Governor. The opposition have to be filling their Depends[tm] when they read things like this. I wonder just how many of them are now spooked to be appearing alongside her at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference?

It’s War, not a Crime Spree By Sarah Palin



President Obama’s meeting with his top national security advisers does nothing to change the fact that his fundamental approach to terrorism is fatally flawed. We are at war with radical Islamic extremists and treating this threat as a law enforcement issue is dangerous for our nation’s security. That’s what happened in the 1990s and we saw the result on September 11, 2001. This is a war on terror not an “overseas contingency operation.” Acts of terrorism are just that, not “man caused disasters.” The system did not work. Abdulmutallab was a child of privilege radicalized and trained by organized jihadists, not an “isolated extremist” who traveled to a land of “crushing poverty.” He is an enemy of the United States, not just another criminal defendant.

It simply makes no sense to treat an al Qaeda-trained operative willing to die in the course of massacring hundreds of people as a common criminal. Reports indicate that Abdulmutallab stated there were many more like him in Yemen but that he stopped talking once he was read his Miranda rights. President Obama’s advisers lamely claim Abdulmutallab might be willing to agree to a plea bargain – pretty doubtful you can cut a deal with a suicide bomber. John Brennan, the President’s top counterterrorism adviser, bizarrely claimed “there are no downsides or upsides” to treating terrorists as enemy combatants. That is absurd. There is a very serious downside to treating them as criminals: terrorists invoke their “right” to remain silent and stop talking. Terrorists don’t tell us where they were trained, what they were trained in, who they were trained by, and who they were trained with. Giving foreign-born, foreign-trained terrorists the right to remain silent does nothing to keep Americans safe from terrorist threats. It only gives our enemies access to courtrooms where they can publicly grandstand, and to defense attorneys who can manipulate the legal process to gain access to classified information.

President Obama was right to change his policy and decide to send no more detainees to Yemen where they can be free to rejoin their war on America. Now he must back off his reckless plan to close Guantanamo, begin treating terrorists as wartime enemies not suspects alleged to have committed crimes, and recognize that the real nature of the terrorist threat requires a commander-in-chief, not a constitutional law professor.
---o0o---

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Sarah Palin, the reluctant warrior (and cultural, ethical, and political hero)



Former Gov. Sarah Palin yesterday selflessly showed the sacrifice she was willing to make to help this great nation. She described herself as basically a reluctant warrior for freedom in an interview with Fox News host Glenn Beck.

Yes, she said, she did just sign a multi-year deal with Fox that will require her to spend time in New York, but on the other hand, The Ex-Governor said she would “be perfectly happy to go back to Wasilla, Alaska, with my five children and grandson and raise a happy, healthy family and love the great outdoors and do the things we do in Alaska.”

Palin is writing books, and making speeches and appearances because she believes “that in some capacity I can help this great nation.”

I’m going to be willing to sacrifice and change some things and my lifestyle in order to serve,” she said. “It doesn’t have to mean, though, top dog. That doesn't have to entail having any kind of title.” Don't say that Sarah! We have a growing army out here that is willing to follow you to "the gates of Hell," if we need to. go Go GO!!!
---o0o---

Monday, January 11, 2010

Fox-y Lady




Love it! Sarah joins the A-Team at Fox. Lock and load, sister!


Jack Brummet's portrait of Sarah Palin (awesome)


click to enlarge

Jack is the editor of All This Is That, and an advisor to this blog, despite the fact that his blog is a political sewer.
---o0o---

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Steven Schmidt unloads another steaming pile of dog-s**t on Sarah Palin



In an interview reported on Politico.com today, Steven Schmidt--John McCain’s top campaign strategist (he did a bang-up job on that)--said that "Sarah Palin was dishonest as the GOP’s vice-presidential nominee" and that her lies have probably fatally damaged her public image.

“There were numerous instances that she said things that were – that were not accurate that ultimately, the campaign had to deal with,” said Steve Schmidt in an interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes. “That opened the door to criticism that she was being untruthful and inaccurate. And I think that is something that continues to this day.”

About the report on the recent ethics investigation of Palin, Schmidt said "she went out and said, you know, ‘This report completely exonerates me,’” Schmidt said. “And in fact, it – it didn’t. You know it’s the equivalent of saying down is up and up is down. It was probably, demonstrably untrue.”

The GOP strategist has previously and frequently criticized the Ex-Governor, but never taken it to the level of questioning her integrity, and never before in the national media. Previously he stuck to leaks and a whispering campaign.

Finally Schmidt admitted I believe, had she not been on the ticket our margin of defeat would’ve been greater than it would’ve been otherwise.” Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31335.html#ixzz0cHYm4PrY
---o0o---

I'm wearing this today!


Everyone talks about Freedom and Liberty, but today, with Sarah getting a spot on Fox News, I feel like these words mean something more. They're like giant, righteous lasers, pointed at the terrorists and haters and sad, liberal crybabies.

I wish the election were tomorrow - Go, Sarah, Go!

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Contender Sarah Palin's first gig on the 2012 Campaign Trail

By Mona Goldwater
with Pablo Fanque (research and analysis)

Ex-Alaska governor Sarah Palin's decision to attend and give a speech at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans in April, 2010 transmogrifies the gathering into the first beauty contest of the 2012 Presidential campaign. Saran Palin announced Thursday that she would attend. And she will not be attending an earlier Beltway conference (CPAC), mostly due to its far right connections (The John Birch Society, amionf others).

She'll show up at the SRLC as one of eight featured speakers (along with the usual heavy contributors, up-and-comers, and high level party hacks.

Governor Haley Barbour
Governor Mitch Daniels
Governor Bobby Jindal
Governor Tim Pawlenty
Ex-Governor Sarah Palin
Ex-Speaker Newt Gingrich
Ex-Governor Mike Huckabee
Ex-Governor Mitt Romney


So far unannounced (or weaseling) are possible candidates like Ex-Governor Mitt Romney (the GOP establishment pick for President), South Dakota Sen. John Thune, and Ex-Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.


I bet we also see Ex-Governor Jeb Bush emerge as a contender. He may not be photogenic or possess much of a Q rating, but he's smarter and craftier than most of the field. It wouldn't shock me if Ex-George Pataki floated a trial balloon or two. Why not?! One pol who will not be testing the waters is the man eager to become Ex-Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, who, alas, was born an Austrian, and who will soon rejoin the movie business. Maybe Ex-VP Dan Quayle will give it one last hurrah, just in case lightning strikes.
---o0o---

Friday, January 8, 2010

"Can I call you Joe?" - an excerpt from Going Rogue

Numerous media outlets are reporting than an upcoming 60 Minutes feature promises "revelations" from the 2008 presidential campaign. This feature includes a segment with erstwhile McCain campaign flack Steve Schmidt. Yeah, these guys don't seem to hesitate to pile on Sarah Palin (and let's face it these limp McCain staffers have spent the last 14 months trying to slough off blame for their election loss onto Sarah). Don't listen to those brain-damaged ex-McCain staffers. . . read what Sarah Palin wrote in her biography instead.

"During [debate] rehearsals, I accidentally called Randy [Scheunemann who was playing the part of Senator Biden] "Senator O'Biden" -- a slip-of-the-lip combination of Obama and Biden. The blunder struck too often, even tripping up campaign staffers. (Jay Leno later made the same slip on his new talk show, so we were in good company.) We laughed about it but knew that if I said it even once during the debate, it would be disastrous.

Then somebody said, "You ought to just call him Joe."

"Oh, I can't just call him Joe!" I said. Senator Biden was a senior statesman. He'd been sitting in a U.S. Senate seat since I was nine years old. I believed calling him by his first name without his permission would be disrespectful.

Randy seemed to read my thoughts and offered a solution. "In every debate, you cross the stage and shake hands with your opponent," he said. "When you shake hands, just ask him for permission to call him Joe. He's certainly going to say yes, because he's a gentleman."

So that's what we decided I would do. We had no idea my mic would already be hot when I walked onstage, crossed over to his turf, and said, "Can I call you Joe?"

The "expert" postdebate analysis was that my question was a cleverly devised strategy to disarm my opponent. Yeah, right. [Going Rogue page 289]"

---o0o---

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Cool off, Mr Hot-head!

By Geraldine Prescott

Sarah, so close to Mr Ozone he might melt! Today in Fairbanks it was a normal zero-degrees, just like it's been for centuries, and just like it will be tomorrow. Glad to see Sarah standing up to icy Al - by springtime he'll just be a puddle!


Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Beg pardon?



Sarah Palin is a direct descendant of Wild Bill Hickok? That's what the Omaha World Herald seems to be reporting, saying that the lineage is easily traceable to the frontier rogue. No question they both share the fire. Insiders in the Palin camp smirk and say, "no comment." History will may be the keeper of this mystery, but I suspect Aces and Eights will be dealt to anyone that stands in her way to DC.

God bless.

-Phil


Sarah Palin Supporter Links



---o0o---

Draft Sarah Palin to run for President!











---o0o---

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Sarah out making money for the Republicans



Although many Republicans seem to kick sand in her face, the GOP doesn't mind bringing in Sarah Palin when they need to raise some dough!
I was just invited on Facebook to a fundraiser in Central Arkansas (Clinton Country!) on February 16th. The event will be held at the Verizon Arena in North Little Rock at 6:00 that night. More details to follow soon. The dinner will cost $175 a plate to raise money for the Republican Party.



It's curious the GOP doesn't bring in Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, or even George Bush. Why? Because Sarah can fill the seats! It looks like they're starting to take her seriously.

Onward and upward friends!
---o0o---

Monday, January 4, 2010

Sarah and Hillary Clinton top the list of most admired women



"Americans have decided on the women they admire the most -- and their picks might surprise some."

I don't think Sarah and Hillary have much at all in common, other than both being authors of million seller books. What they do have in common is a lot of love from the public. And, as Sarah begins the slow slog to the White House, as Neil Young once wrote, "It's gonna take a lot of love."



According to a survey just released by USA Today and the Gallup Poll, 62 year old Clinton just edged out out Palin, 45, as the most admired female -- 16% to 15% in a poll of 1,025 American adults.
---o0o---

Sunday, January 3, 2010

Going Rogue is now platinum, and sales are holding steady


Sarah at the most recent book signing...




Going Rogue has gone "platinum." The book sold more than a million copies far faster than either Barack Obama, Hillary, or Bill Clinton's autobiographies. There are 2.5 million copies in print now. Have you bought yours yet??
---o0o---

Saturday, January 2, 2010

USA Today calls Sarah Palin one of 2009's biggest political winners


USA Today has labeled Governor Palin one of the biggest "political winners" of 2009 because "by the end of 2009, she was a best-selling author and a hero for anti-spending, anti-Obama Tea Party conservatives who are emerging as a political force."
---o0o---

The best second amendment t-shirt we've ever seen


---o0o---

The Comment Corps -- defending Sarah Palin

Make sure there is balance in the social conversation in online media. Join the Comment Corps and be notified of new articles on the web where you can ensure your comment is heard. Notify the rest of the team of articles with comments that ignore the facts, flat-out lie, or need a reality check (which--let's face it--just about everything about Sarah that appears in the media does!).

Help stop the elite press and distressed liberals from lying about Sarah Palin. Sign up here.

The liberals and press have become spooked--they are terrified at the momentum Sarah is gaining. They laughed at her book until it became a mega best seller. And now they are lashing out in every way they can. But we can fight back--because we're right! Join the Comment Corps today!
---o0o---

Friday, January 1, 2010